Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman just teased the announcement which he says will be coming “shortly.” The studio’s initiative will be “very small,” beginning with “a project based on one of our film properties,” he said at the Deutsche Bank Media, Internet and Telecom conference. It will enable Paramount to “get back, with very little investment, into the television production business.” Meanwhile he says that Paramount is “helping us to create value throughout Viacom.” Saying that the studio is performing financially at “steady state,” he talked up the SpongeBob SquarePants movie which will kick off a schedule of one animated release per year. “It’s also good for the Nickelodeon brand.” Viacom also sees “tremendous receptivity” overseas to the Paramount Channel. And Dauman says he’s encouraged by upcoming releases including Star Trek and World War Z.


“Very little investment” seems to be Paramount’s model for most things these days.
Dauman is “encouraged by upcoming releases including…World War Z!?” If that’s the case, he’s the only one because the stories about how difficult that production is are almost legendary.
Problematic productions don’t necessarily bode ill for box office prospects. I remember reading about how troubled Titanic was…look how that turned out. Dauman no doubt knows that even if it’s lousy, people will still go and see zombies.
TV shows adapted on established films have yet to be proven successful. Particulary when putting profit before establishing a quality creative product.
Ever hear of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? Not a hit movie. Epic hit in television.
Not really “epic.” Toward the bottom of the Nielsens its whole run, like 50s and 60s. If it had been on a Big Four network it would have gotten cancelled way earlier, or not made it to air at all. Sweet, wet kisses and multiple covers from Entertainment Weekly at the time made it look like it was bigger than it was, too.
Stargate SG-1: look it up!
Fire adam goodman. He’s terrible.
i bet it’s a top gun series….
I’d like to see a Mission:Impossible spin-off featuring one of the other teams that could back-story into future movies. I suspect Disney’s future Avengers and Star Wars series will do this.
I’ll second the motion for a new “Mission:Impossible” series
Could they do it without feeding Tom Cruise’s ego?
I smell another Star Trek series….
me too… but the problem is .. that now all the of the stars in the ST movie are now (and have always been) way too big for a weekly TV show. They’d have to start from scratch again (the fans would revolt), recast (same) or simply go back to the original spate of series (ST, Next Gen, Deep Space, Voyager, Enterprise). I wouldn’t want to be the exec that makes that creative/business decision.
They’ll ignore the existing series and spin a new crew off Abrams movies, for example with Quinto, Cho or Urban as the lead, everyone else is new, or introduce a character or situation in the upcoming or third movie that can segue into a series. Plenty of ways to piggyback off Abrams’ movies big PR.
Fans will squall but let’s face it, the success of a new Star Trek series will lie in its appeal to non-fans, the ones who have no idea there have been five series so far (not counting the animated series). The fans were the 3-4M who still watched Enterprise till the bitter end.
They’ll need three times that number to make it on CBS. I hope they do a deal with Netflix or Amazon and get some streaming revenues in there because I doubt any sci fi series could get survival level ratings on CBS.
I was one of those 3-4 million, and if they can’t make it on CBS, there’s always the CW. All their best hits are genre shows anyway!
Why not first-run?
CBS owns the brand actually.
CBS owns the CW: see above!
Did I see Star Trek and TV in the same sentence or at least story?
What CBS and Amazon are doing with Under the Dome would be a nice test case for how to get a pricey niche genre with a big brand name attached to work financially on TV again. (Of course as a Netflix subscriber, I’m hoping that CBS will at least consider them if only to spark a bidding war.)
“The studio’s initiative will be “very small,” beginning with “a project based on one of our film properties”
So transformers the TV series?
Megan or Rosie?
Another movie to tv prpoerty, Stargate was a very successful tv series (10 seasons and 2 spin offs).
Back in the late 70′s and early 80′s Paramount utterly dominated the tv landscape with hit shows. It was nothing for them to have 3 of the top five tv shows and 7 of the top ten in one week. Mork and Mindy, Happy Days, and Laverne & Shirley were usually the top 3 shows and scattered throughout the top ten you might find Taxi, Angie, or some other Paramount program. WOW, do I miss the good ole days of the family sitcom. Not many family sitcoms around anymore.
Coming to Spike: Beverly Hills Cop
A TV Series where the characters hope for better or even hope that life on another planet is going to be better than here on earth tend to do well. Let us hope that they do not start a series where the audience gets bored to death and starts another zombie epidemic though.
CBS Studios took all of Paramount Television (itself started when the movie house purchased Desilu). Why bother to split the companies in two (VIACOM and CBS Corp) only to watch them both build back into what they were prior? Moonves began CBS Films over at CBS Corp and now Par wants back in the television game? Why?