“I have seen the future, and it works,” journalist Lincoln Steffens famously, if inaccurately, said in 1919 about his visit to the Soviet Union. But BTIG analyst Rich Greenfield may have better luck with a similar forecast he’s making this morning about the media business after watching a new online cartoon series that Rovio just introduced based on its Angry Birds franchise. It’s the latest sign that “the pace of innovation is accelerating and that traditional media industry gatekeepers run by executives such as Brian Roberts, Rupert Murdoch, Bob Iger, Sumner Redstone, Jeff Bewkes, etc. do not hold the same grip on content creation and distribution that they once did,” Greenfield says. While traditional moguls try to tighten their grip on pay TV, they’re slowly being outflanked by competitors playing by their own rules on the Web. For example, there’s Glenn Beck’s initiative to create a potent online media business, Netflix’s slick TV series House Of Cards, and VEVO’s effort last week to launch an online-based service with 24/7 scheduled programming — much like a traditional TV channel. “While it is certainly not an easy path, we expect brands to love the idea of advertising/sponsoring content that talks to an engaged global audience (very different than the traditional TV world where nobody is watching commercials and online banners nobody is looking at),” Greenfield says. He notes that Angry Birds Toons “is not a one-time event, but rather an ongoing strategy to build far deeper engagement with the global Angry Birds game-playing user base.”

What a clown. If Rich Greenfield thinks he has any idea what the future of online media holds, he’s out of his mind. Maybe the Disney’s of the world can’t move as fast as the Rovios of the world. But the Rovios of the world can’t move as fast as the kid in junior high, who’s making even funnier videos on You Tube. The media world is shattering into a million little pieces of cheap entertainment that people will watch by themselves rather than together at a theater or in front of the television with their family and friends. Not sure why we should be excited by this.
What exactly is your point? You basically just reaffirmed what Greenfield says above, but with a salty tone. Young minds and new tech are creating more media beyond the grasp of old media. Same thing.
People do in fact get excited about change in various industries, especially media and the disruptive technologies involved.
Guess you’re ahead of everyone else on this. Kudos to you Einstein.
Cable providers are still a huge problem. Actions you cite may force their hand to do ala carte, but not so far. As people do drop cable for Netflix, Hulu and stuff like this providers jack up Internet prices, already seen as speed/tier pricing is evolving. It’s about revenue stream and they protect it no matter what. Stuff shouldn’t be free, but costs have become ludicrous.
What novelty? Programs were single-sponsored from back in the days when broadcast was entirely radio. Cartoons have been populated by characters designed first for merchandising for over 30 years.
Seems to me, the only wrinkle here is that there is no regulatory agency empowered to take complaints about advertising-saturated programming targeted at children.
Ironically, the Past is trying to get the internet regulated under the banner of stopping piracy. It is exactly content monitoring. Were it in place (and its first effect might be to raise costs so that only big media can afford meeting regulatory demands), there might be a move to visit regulating content as appropriate for general and children’s consumption.
Greenflied’s right. The big media co’s are al flat-footed here… Some, like TW and Viacom, worse than others.
As the history of the media biz shows, once change happens it happens very quickly, and then it causes the big media co’s to overcompensate and do stupid things like the AOL/TW merger.
Does anyone have access to this report?
Let’s see if Rovio makes any money off of these cartoons first, and then I’ll be happy to hear about how the landscape is changing. And don’t be fooled by the notion that the profits will come from licensed merchandise. Angry Birds could be a fad that may run its course by the time that Rovio gets its (gasp) Angry Birds feature off the ground. There’s a very good chance that you could walk into your local toy store next year and see a mark-down bin full of One Direction dolls and Angry Birds toys. PS – I don’t expect Disney will renew Rovio’s Star Wars Angry Birds license either.
Angry Birds merch has been in cut-out bins here in the US for at least 6-8 months. Still might be big overseas. Shod be interesting to watch.
Angry Birds is no comparison to real console games. Give me a break.
Once upon a time.
Someone had a great idea to remake TV as we know it. They were successful for a while. But one-day, they sold their company to Disney. Now their content airs on traditional television.
And they all lived happily ever after.
On a mobile device, this consumes a whole lot of bandwidth. The videos do not download to your device after the first time you view them. Which means that every time you want an episode you are streaming it from the web, and burning your data plan.
The obvious intended demographic is kids – who don’t particularly care about the costs of a mobile internet access. And, they want to see a good, fun thing again and again.
Rovio does not provide any way to control access to the toons. Which means that if your kid picks up your cell phone to play with Angry Birds Star Wars, you can kiss some serious bandwidth good-bye.
Bottom line, get ready bear some serious data charges on your mobile internet access.
BTW, no cellular service provider in my country has an unlimited 3G data plan. So, I’m wondering, is it just me who is shocked that my son used up 1GB of my data plan, in 2 days, just watching these toons?