About 32M people in the U.S. tweeted about TV shows last year. And a study out this morning from Nielsen and SocialGuide says that programmers should pay attention: The seemingly random messages Twitter users generate can provide a statistically meaningful early warning about whether a show is catching on. “We expected to see a correlation between Twitter and TV ratings, but this study quantifies the strength of that relationship,” says Andrew Somosi, CEO of SocialGuide, which is co-owned by Nielsen and McKinsey and monitors the links between social media and TV. For example, the firms saw a pattern for shows that had been on at least one season. Ratings for the premiere episode vs the previous season tended to be 1% higher among 18- to 34-year-olds when their tweets about the show were up 8.5%. Similarly, premiere ratings for 35- to 49-year-olds rose 1% when their tweets were +14%. The pattern held for midseason shows: This time ratings among the younger group rose 1% when their tweets increased 4.2% while the older group showed a bump when their messages were +8.4%. “While our study doesn’t prove causality, the correlation we uncovered is significant and we will continue our research to deepen the industry’s understanding of this relationship,” Nielsen EVP Mike Hess says.
Twitter Data Can Provide Early Insights Into TV Ratings: Study
By DAVID LIEBERMAN, Executive Editor | Wednesday March 20, 2013 @ 10:38am EDTTags: Nielsen, TV Ratings, Twitter
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2013/03/twitter-data-correlation-tv-ratings-nielsen-socialguide/
COMMENTS (7)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
Marketplace
-
‘Friends’ Reunion – ‘Ellen’
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Network Index 1 NCIS CBS 138 2 NCIS: Los Angeles CBS 133 3 La Patrona TELMUN-B 127 4 Criminal Minds CBS 127 5 CSI: Crime Scene CBS 126 6 The Good Wife CBS 125 7 The Mentalist CBS 124 8 Por ella soy Eva UNIV-B 124 9 Blue Bloods CBS 122 10 Amor bravio UNIV-B 121 SOURCE: RENTRAK.COMBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Twitter @DeadlineNY
Cannes: SPC Sinks Teeth Into Jim Jarmusch’s ‘Only Lovers Left Alive’ http://t.co/AxvMiLOZTaAbout 7 hours ago

Fantastic news. Twitter is basically the same as millions of people shouting at each other in an open field, but marketing execs consider it a vital tool to use while making all the same boneheaded decisions.
Actually, what Nielsen is trying to say is… “Twitter is just as accurate as us.”
OMG, #hilarious
You must not use Twitter.
Actually, this says nothing at all except shows that are bigger on one platform are also bigger on another. They admit they can’t point to any causality — I would suspect bigger TV shows drive more Twitter usage is a more likely conclusion than the other way around.
this cannot and should not apply to all shows.
right now, “scandal” benefits greatly from twitter because the cast live tweets and is very engaged with their followers. but not all shows can/should/need to do this.
USA Network as a whole is also very good with using twitter to promote their shows.
but it would be terribly ill-advised and inaccurrate to link twitter with ratings.
It’s a big coincidence that Nielsen should release this report (they wrote) two days after Wired posted an article claiming that Nielsen were no longer relevant.
The wired article infers that there is no universal or useful correlation between Nielsen and twitter activity. It goes further to show that there is an (unspoken) industry acceptance that twitter activity is the more important metric for advertisers because it shows that the viewers are actually engaged with the show.
For smaller shows, Nielsen ratings may depend on the activity of less than 100 of their entire survey group. That is a statistically insignificant number of people and their activity should not be extrapolated to cover the entire US audience. The bias is amplified when you realize that Nielsen Families are of an idiosyncratic “Type” that would agree to have their viewing habits monitored.
Nielsen can detect the rise and fall of hit shows, but there are only so many hit shows to go around and their scarcity value may mean that advertisers are not actually getting the best “bang for their buck”.
Twitter on the other hand may provide advertisers with evidence that shows which Nielsen would claim to be dead dogs are actually hives of activity filled with engaged fans and, (thanks to Nielsen’s under-reporting), advertisers can (and do) reach their desired target demographics and headcounts via these “small” shows well below their true market value.