Someone whom I consider very smart about Hollywood tonight emailed me a contrarian analysis about the GE/Vivendi deal just concluded. He factors in ex-NBCU chief Bob Wright's foresight to prop up NBC with cable acquisitions -- a template Jeff Zucker slavishly followed and ridiculously took credit for:
I think GE made a great deal and Vivendi got screwed.
This now closes the chapter on the deal Vivendi made in 2004 to sell Universal to GE. Universal was valued at $14 billion then (most of which related to its ownership of the USA Network and Sci Fi Channel). GE bought it for $5.2 billion in cash and debt assumed, plus giving Vivendi a 20% stake in the new NBC Universal entity (valued at $44 billion in total, so Vivendi’s notional share was $8.8 billion).
Vivendi’s rationale for accepting this deal instead of all-cash offers from Comcast and Cablevision was that it had such faith in GE management that it was sure its 20% stake would grow over time. So they wanted to ride that upside. Obviously they did not count on NBC’s disastrous management team destroying roughly $17 billion+ in value (adding in their investments in Oxygen, Weather Channel, iVillage and others, and given the $30 billion valuation now agreed with Comcast).
So with its 20% stake now worth $5.8 billion, they wound up selling Universal to GE for $11 billion. That's a shockingly low number, particularly considering it has been the former Universal assets which provide most of the earnings for NBCU now (particularly USA and Syfy).
Credit Bob Wright for having had the foresight to see NBC was headed off a cliff and snookering Vivendi at a time when they were extremely vulnerable.
I think GE made a great deal and Vivendi got screwed.
Vivendi’s rationale for accepting this deal instead of all-cash offers from Comcast and Cablevision was that it had such faith in GE management that it was sure its 20% stake would grow over time. So they wanted to ride that upside. Obviously they did not count on NBC’s disastrous management team destroying roughly $17 billion+ in value (adding in their investments in Oxygen, Weather Channel, iVillage and others, and given the $30 billion valuation now agreed with Comcast).


What did Vivendi pay Bronson for Universal in the first place? Subtracting that from the 11 Billion they are walking away with now makes there loss even more brutal…
half the story. That was the downside scenario and imagine what NBC would like today without Universal assets? The upside was all about content and developing out cable and digital assets. Problem was a combination of folks leaving (Falco to AOL, Zaslaw to Discovery, Stacey Snyder to DW, Wright retiring) and slow movement on acquisition of Dreamworks (Amblin’ is on the Universal lot!!) and poor program development (Silverman??). So once again good deal killed by poor execution. Good news is Comcast is buying at very low multiple and able to gear up its balance sheet. (In world of declining growth a cable best way to drive higher ROE is through leverage) asn if they get any turn around at UNI or improvement on NBC returns look great. So at end of day a good deal for GE (they are out of biz that the new team hasn’t been able to manage) Vivend (they can now go play in Brazil and Comcast. Key will be who is running show in eight months.
Very insightful analysis, although like almost all writing on this subject it never factors in the loss of NBC-UNI value that occurred during the stockmarket crash of last March. GE took a big hit at that time and NBC-UNI with it, so if we’re going to add up the figures ( or perhaps subtract down, in this case ) let’s at least include all the figures that led to this devaluation, for accuracy’s sake.
Since Vivendi is a French Corporation it reports earnings and is valued in Euros.
In 2004 the Euro was valued between $1.20 and $1.30. Even at the weakest rate, today’s figure of $5.8 billion would have yielded E4.46 Billion.
At 2009 exchange rates (Euro= $1.5) the amount yielded is E3.87.
Really not a good deal.
Especially since the putative residual value of $8.8 billion (in 2004) would have yielded E6.77 billion at the then prevalent exchange rate.
Analysis ignores history, meaning the fact that Vivendi is a water company and never had any business owning a content company. Vivendi was screwed not on the GE/Comcast deal but rather back when then-CEO Jean Marie Messier decided that Vivendi could be all things to all people. This deal makes sense for Vivendi since they are least able to cash out the last vestige of Messier’s folly, and at a time when they can use the funds.