Faced with $3.7 billion in debt due in July 2012, MGM will pay $250 million in interest alone by April 2010. Just think if that money could be spent on actual film production. Shame on Harry Sloan who took over the moribund studio in 2005 after Sony and Comcast and Providence Equity Partners and TPG Capital paid roughly $5 billion in debt and equity to acquire then publicly traded MGM from its majority owner Kirk Kerkorian. But he waited, and waited, and waited, until it was too late and the credit crisis had begun, to put MGM on firm financial footing. But I hear his production boss Mary Parent is helping to make that happen now after nagging everyone to get ahead of this coming 2012 crisis with the intent of freeing up the company from some of this long-term debt to allow additional capital to finance more productions for her. The good news is that MGM (a private company so, frankly, it can claim anything it wants to without fear of the SEC) isn't going out of business right this minute. Not with a library that throws off half a billion dollars annually.
In fact, the studio is making movies (see below) while reporting today that it made its numbers for last year and are current on its debt payments. I'd love to believe this. Even more, I'm relieved the studio is coming clean about its problems after I'd be hearing for the past month that MGM debtholders and equity stakeholders have been fighting to the point where both sides are "on a war footing". That's been exacerbated by the coming audit this summer to identify ongoing projects, etc. The fear is, if the auditors were to represent that the studio isn't a going concern, that would bring on a battle royale. And I'd also heard that UA's Merrill Lynch money was "hanging by a thread".
Today, sources owned up to me that what I and other journalists had reported about Goldman Sachs trying to come to the rescue was true. GS has been helping raise more capital. I'm told that one possibility explored was MGM selling off United Artists. (The cash from the sale would have been used for operational needs at MGM. But the banks who relied on that asset would have to sign off on such a deal.) Now investment bankers Moelis & Co have been hired to advise the studio on a potential restructuring and to explore options for optimizing its capital structure (i.e. talking to lenders about altering MGM's long-term debt obligations). "You lower your interest payments, you free up cash to make more movies," a source tells me. "With debt selling at a discount [$.50 on the dollar], every company is doing the same."I hope this new plan of attack can help. Because it's vital to Hollywood that this buyer survive.
First, here is MGM's statement that just came into me at 11 AM when MGM held a lenders' call:
MAY 14, 2009 – Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. is discussing its financial results in a call with its lenders today. The company is reporting that its cash flow for the fiscal year ended March 31 was in line with its budget and that the company is in compliance with all loan covenants. On the call, MGM also will say it is exploring options for optimizing its capital structure and has begun talks with a steering committee of its lenders as part of the process. The company has hired Moelis & Co. as financial advisor to help it in these efforts. The company is committed to its business plan, which calls for it to remain independent, continue its motion picture production and television activities and leverage the value of its film library.
No matter what happens in the long-term, the fact is that in the short-term, everyone understands that the best way to maintain the value of the MGM assets is to be in the production business. And the $250M revolver debt due in April 2010 gets replenished from MGM's revenues like box office.
Here's what MGM claims is its current movie slate: Fame is Mary Parent's first pic at MGM: it's in post-production with a release date of September 25th. Cabin In The Woods is shooting now and scheduled for February 5, 2010. Hot Tub Time Machine also started in Vancouver for release on February 26th, 2010. And The Zookeeper (a pay or play deal with Mall Cop's Kevin James) is in pre-production for a July 23rd, 2010, release.
The rest of the movie slate for 2010 are Poltergeist (Q2/Q3, The Three Stooges (Q3/Q4), Red Dawn (Q3), The Matarese Circle (Q3/Q4), Conjurer Wife (TBD) and Something Borrowed (TBD).
Also on the horizon are the two Hobbit movies produced by Peter Jackson, more of the James Bond franchise starring Daniel Craig, the RoboCop reboot by Darren Aronofsky, and now the possibility of the Terminator deal.
Everyone knows that Mary Parent has been holding the studio together with the equivalent of chicken wire: specifically by partnering with studios left and right because they are willing to front the costs of each production. She also has been making some of the slate with the money from UA's deal with Merrill Lynch. Whether this convinces auditors that MGM is really in the movie biz, plus what is supposedly happening on the TV side (Stargate, BBC mini-series, etc) remains to be seen. If not, then MGM could be declared technically insolvent. And all hell breaks loose.
- Icahn Interested In MGM, Too?
- Layoffs And Firings At MGM
- Clark Woods Out At MGM Distribution
- TheDeal.com Also Says MGM Is For Sale...
- MGM Now Claims It's Not On The Block
- Goldman Sachs Shopping MGM -- Again
- Paula Wagner Is DOA At UA; But Was It Suicide or Murder By MGM?
- Another Top Executive Exits United Artists
- Hey, Harry Sloan, Show Us MGM's Money
- Hey, What's With MGM's Hiring Spree?
- Desperate MGM Studios Throws Hail Mary


Any connection between this and the fact that MGM needs a shit-ton of cash to make the Terminator thing happen?
Poor MGM.
It was once the biggest, and most glamorous studio. Now it’s stuck co-producing the Bond movies and remakes that really shouldn’t be remade(Pink Panther).
I think they need to rebuild, from the ground up, and start all over again as a completely new company, leaving the past to their home video division. Of course that would need money, and who has any of that these days.
They have no money. Let me repeat. They have no money. Mary Parent is trying to corral Tom Cruise and is spending the UA money. They have no money. None. Zippo. They are running on credit and fumes, and have overpaid writers for scripts with great ideas but mediocre writing. Then they have to pay to get them re-written.
No one wants to work there. Most especially the people working for Mary.
Dan (on the inside)…
MGM also had a terrific Home Video / Home Entertainment Vault. Then they took it to Sony. The problem is not the HE Vault – its the people that work there….The Home Entertainment Division DROVE MGM into the ground…..guess who’s next: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment. (SPHE).
Because the Vaults / Catalogs are bad?
No: Because Management is 100% LOST!
Becuase DVD’s are NOT selling?
No: Because Management is 100% LOST!
When you hear the SPHE is losing money – it aint cause DVD’s aren’t selling – they are.
I repeat: Management.
Dan – if you are this miserable and on the inside, then get the hell out. i am also on the inside, and the vibe, energy, and excitement friggin rock. the projects are commercial, so much so that everyone in town wants parts of them. take your bitterness elsewhere…loser
did this article come straight from Mary Parent’s publicist?
mgm will be declared insolvent – there’s no way they can make up this debt amount
this is too bad, but in this credit crisis there’s no point in continuing to fund the place: they have made bad creative decisions – i’m sorry Fame?
they do know it’s not 1987 right? even Goldmas is like hello? creativity please?
would bankruptcy work? if they could keep this place on the rails thru 2013 available money will return but yikes!
these debt payments would kill any studio – heck they’d prob kill microsoft!
If MGM sells United Artists, what will then happen with the James Bond franchise rights? Isn’t the righs split between Danjaq (Broccoli family) and UA? So if UA really gets new owner hanns, will MGM still keep the rights to produce and distribute new Bonds films? And what about the older movies?
Bernt
Mary Parent is kind ‘o scary. And she’s got weird taste in movies. I know she didn’t cause this train wreck, but asking her to drive the train is liking asking Joan Rivers to be the celebrity apprentice.
step 1: Dump Cruise, step 1: Dump Cruise
Mary Parent has Tom Cruise under some sort of spell and is using the UA money to finance her bad projects (Fame remake, come on). Maybe Tom Cruise let’s Mary spend UA’s money because he can’t get a job anywhere else.
“IN COMPLIANCE WITH COVENANTS” MEANINGLESS. THESE WERE EASED WHEN MONEY WAS FREER BUT THE PIPER SOON (VERY SOON) HAS TO BE PAID — BUT WITH WHAT? THIS IS AN INEVITABLE DISASTER UNLESS KIRK TRIES AGAIN…THE LIBRARY IS ONLY WORTH SO MUCH AND CERTAINLY NOT $3+ BILLION IN TODAY’S MARKET. AS ALWAYS, IT’S ONLY ABOUT JAMES BOND WHEN YOU ANALYZE THE BIG $$$ VALUES. SAD STORY.
At least Nikki is the only one who remotely has started to disspell Sloan’s competence. The biggest mistake the owners made was hiring him in the first place, someone who’s good at deflecting from himself and no clue about running a company. Parent might be a bit scary but can you blame her? She’s got her rep on the line and probably regrets ever coming to work at MGM.
who f’ing cares. this studio has been raped repeatedly by it’s owners for decades. it’s pathetic and all at the top should be ashamed of themselves, starting with mr. kerkorian.
who f’ing cares. this is what is expected from this pathetic shell….
It’s turned into a cautionary tale. And btw, I’ve also heard from people on the inside that they’re miserable and looking to jump ship.
First of all – this comes to me second hand. But my best friend works at Lakeshore and apparentley they are in deep doo doo with FAME. It’s tested poorly, feels like a dated STEP UP, and apprently Mary P is flipping out. Blaming everyone (but herself). Another test tonight, btw. The truth is, when she worked with Stuber, he had the taste, she had the drive. The combo worked as long as you don’t credit her with script judgement. Ask anyone who knows her – she has very mediocre taste. She has overpaid for “high profile” projects just to announce her presence, and her desperation to play with the big boys is transparent at best. She’s not one of the big boys. Or girls. She’s an ambitious wannabe. Who, unfortunately for Harry Sloan, has tons of drive, but little taste. She needs to start making better acquistions. Fisrt thing I’d do is reduce her $6 millon per year salary. Honestly – FAME?! Yowza.
At an agency meeting recently Mary’s taste level was raised based on the amount of female oriented movies that she’s passed on. She has a very narrow taste margin and it tends to be male oriented. Nothing wrong with that, but of the movies she’s chosen – there’s nothing great. Movies like SEX AND THE CITY and HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU would never occur to her. She dismisses them as too female. Someone should relieve he of her duties, or figure out a way to bring Toby Emmerich over. He does male and female movies quite successfully and has demonstrated a creativity level that unfortunately she has not.
We too have heard that FAME is forgettable. But perhpas some of her other projects will work. I hope for her sake it will. She’s not a bad lady, but unless she finds a partner to off set her lousy taste – then this experiment will surely fail.
Does anyone on these message boards ever have anything nice to say about anyone on these stories?
Note to Mary,
FAME?
Honestly?
If it doesn’t work do you give some of your salary back?
You what this sounds like? It sounds like RKO in 1957 when a succession of financial cannibals began devouring the studio’s assets. Not that MGM hasn’t been an organ donor for the last 40 years anyway (Kirkorian, Rosenfelt, Begelman, Yablans, Turner, Kirkorian II, Parretti, Legion). The tragedy is that there are some top-notch people there now who appreciate the company’s legacy. Unfortunately, none of them is running the place.
Wow, does that FAME trailer suck. Saw it in the theater last week and you could just feel the hate from the audience.
Although you could say the same about the DANCE FLICK trailer, but at least that’s supposed to be stupid, right?
Mary had a little MGM
She fleeced it white with faux
bad scripts, bad rep, bad support staff
But there was Cruise who needed her so.
He’d lost his Paula
She’d lost her Scott
But they made each other laugh
The problem was
As we all soon learned
They were not the better half.
The better haves
Had dumped them both
So they turned to Harry Sloan
And said, Hey Hair,
Let us run the place
And they have – into the ground.
Some say she should have stayed with Scott
But others surely know
That once Soctt married his lady love
She needed a place to go.
So we watch the mighty studio fall
As Mary chooses wrong
And we pray there’s more in Mary’s vault
Then FAME and all it’s song.
“Toni” brings up an interesting and disturbing phenomenon. Often women who’ve reached high positions are more anti-women than the men. They not only emulate male behavior but go overboard as if to prove to the boys they’re not easy on women. It’s a shame. On one hand, it’s understandable, except in positions of great consequence such as judges (this is a big problem amongst female judges towards other females.) On the other hand, women should change the game, not just emulate the same dumb behavior. It also would be fab to get some ‘female’ movies made that aren’t just about weddings.
What do any of you guys know? Fame was in the works when Rick was still in the corner office, and was pushed heavily by Lakeshore. And let’s not let that element go, while MGM should bring the reigns down on Rosenberg, have any of you losers had to work with that trainwreck? Lakeshore? What the hell have they brought to the table since Million Dollar Baby? Feast of Love? That company is so mismanaged its ridiculous. I mean who picks a choreographer with no directing experience to make a remake of such a hallowed classic? So he made a couple reality shows, you give him the keys to the castle? The only reason Lakeshore is in any sort of business with MGM is for the co-financing. And man what a price it comes at. Whatever decent sort of cuts make it to theaters will be because of Mary. No way Valkyrie makes 80MM without her. Most of MGM’s problems are the result of a bad gamble by the Equity boys agreeing to the Rent-a-Studio BS and being duped by Sony to give up the rights to 2 Bond films in a row in exchange for help buying the Studio. We’ll see how all the bitching agency assistants like Mary’s taste come 2010. Stop obsessing over this blog and get back to the phone sheets you desk jockeys.
I was at a screening tonight in Orange County for FAME. It wasn’t good. But it didn’t totally stink. I’d watch it. On Tv. But judging from audience reaction tonight they have their work cut out for them.
You know that some of these chick-flicks might actually suck, right?
Hire me Hire me. I’ll fix your studio with my great scripts and ideas. As House of Pain said, let’s take our Prozac, to straighten out the reality.
First let’s look at the MGM history recently I bought Ice Station Zebra for 4.95. The music, the sounds, Samuel Jackson in the Jim Brown role, George Clooney as the Ship Captain, set it present day the prize oil wells or like Sahara, some money. Money Maker.
The real Samuel G must be rolling over in heaven knowing that after Meyer kicked him out the studio is on its death bed forty years later. Fix the studio, hire me.
Other remakes on the my top ten list,
1. Ben Hur- Adam Sandler as Ben.
2. Gone With the Wind but this time Sam Jackson gets to say frankly, I don’t give a dam
3. The bird Cage with Madonna and Sally Jesse Raphael
4. Release all your movies on Hulu and You tube, and mail a free coupon for a Coke and microwave popcorn.
Let us start with Ice Station Zebra.
5. Offer a free Looney Toons Festival this summer, create your future customers. Give away a free Lion.
Bugs Bunny should be a household name.
6. Float your debt, sale the Bond franchise and hold off your payments until 2220.
Kill off Daniel Craig in the next Bond movie and bring in someone hot like Jinx who trains the new Bond, someone from the Loch Ness area.
Finally, hire me, I’ll convince Paula and Tom to merge again, let’s do a Top Gun 2 this time Tom is Skerrit and we make that Transformer kid the hot shot pilot, Kelly can come back helping a young female cadet find her way home and true love. Samuel Jackson can be a tough drill Sgt, who ensures the kid doesn’t drop out of Top Gun school and when he’s shot down in Bosnia goes in to rescue him.
This story will only get worse when people realise that MGM can’t even afford to finance the next Bond film!
It’s only a matter of time before MGM is carved up and sold off or simply swallowed up by Fox or Warners.
Robocop?
Come on, enough with the unnecessary remakes already.
any chance GS will try to wrap their failed weinstein deal into this?
8moviesfiveplays you’re hired! You start on Monday.
Mary you’re fired. Please clean out your office today.
This is the most intriguing slate MGM has had in YEARS. Mary Parent just got there and there’s something incredibly sexy about her. Robocop will be Darren’s first big commercial studio picture (and yeah, the Fountain but I mean commercial), he is an extraordinary filmmaker and will do for that franchise what Chris Nolan did for Batman.
Remakes! What is it with Hollywood and these remakes?! A good story is a good story, who cares if it’s a remake, it’s a retelling, people like remakes. Why not tell a good story again for a new generation?
They are trying to remake themselves so it’s perfectly logical to start by reimagining their most famous properties and from the cash flow they get from that they can create new franchises.
Fame, Poltergeist, Robocop, etc. they aren’t remaking Ben Hur, these are good properties that can transcend new decades. In my opinion MP is playing it well.
But on a lighter note, 8plays, that was funny, good work on your slate. That was hilarious and witty.
HARRY SLOAN you’re fired. Please return all the money you plundered from the company for personal interests.
8moviesfiveplays needs to get his facts straight. Ben Hur and Gone With The Wind went with Turner in the 1986 buyout and are now owned by Warner Bros. Looney Tunes is also owned by Warner Bros. and I suspect they might not like MGM giving their content away for free.
Oh and Top Gun is Paramount.
8movies, you’re fired. Mary Parent, you’re rehired.
Mrs. MGM
8movies responds to Nurse Betty. As I said lets all take our Prozac. I like Mary, there’s’ something about her.
1. Dangerous Grounds, loved it.
2. Pleasantville helped Ms. Johnny Cash who is best friends with Ms. Hell boy. I watch it every few months IN LIVING COLOR.
3. Role Models was entertaining.
4. As for 1986 I was in Law School when Tom was dancing across the floor. I’m sure he could co produce with Paramount on a Top gun 2.
5. As for the Turner movie mode Gone With the Wind etc, well, they also own Tom and Jerry so fair is fair, FREE LOONEY TOONS SATURDAYS.
6. As for Mary herself anyone who can RISE from agent trainee to head of a Studio would make Samuel G proud,
I wish her well.
7. As for Nurse Betty well the lyrics say it best (fair use)
“I won’t tear the sack up
Punk you’d better back up
Try and play the role and the whole crew will act up”
It does not seem likely that MGM is going to be able to survive financially in the future, and part of this problem has been increased spending on productions, instead of acquisitions or establishing more profitable joint distribution contracts with other major film studios. Unfortunately, its co-distribution contract with Dimension Films has not been very successful maybe with the exception of the Rob Zombie remake of ‘Halloween’ which was not very spectacular to say the least; and now it has some films on its slate with Columbia Pictures/Sony as well.
Back in March of last fiscal year, MGM reportedly lost almost $400 million YTD, and it is apparent that the debt burdened studio’s losses continue at an accelerated basis. While I do agree that MGM CEO Harry Sloan has made some errors in trying to get the studio back on its feet, and the conflict with United Artists as well, the entire MGM struggle began way back in the late 1960’s when its owner Kirk Kerkorian, and CEO Jim Aubrey decided to cut productions and Kerkorian focusing more on real estate… MGM Grand comes to mind.
As an entertainment major at UCLA, I have enjoyed following and researching this legendary film studio thoroughly. In addition to Kerkorian cutting productions throughout the 1970’s, they thought UA would be profitable when it was purchased in 1981, which it was for a period of time. I think the most crucial downfall was Ted Turner taking almost 85% of the old MGM library (Gone with the Wind, Wizard of Oz, Singing in the Rain), which left the studio with nothing. That library would most likely have helped improved MGM situation as of today.
Then in 1990, when Italian financier Giancarlo Parretti took over MGM through buying independent studios like Cannon and Pathe, and merged those into MGM, this only resulted in further debt, until the loans went into default and its main lender Credit Lyonnais had to foreclose on the studio.
The many CEO’s that have ran MGM over the last thirty years- Jim Aubrey, Frank Yablans, Fred Rosenfelt, Giancarlo Parretti, Alan Ladd Jr., Frank Mancuso and Alex Yeminijdan, all of whom had tried to turn MGM around to some degree, only to see it turn back the other direction several years later. Its a vicious circle, to one of the best loved studios in the entertainment industry. To be frank, I think that if MGM had taken bankruptcy back in 1991 as it had planned to, before Credit Lyonnais repossessed, MGM may have been able to pull itself out of it, and increase its assets further after taking the assets of the Cannon Group and ultimately Orion Pictures.
The product we now see from MGM seems to be much like that of the product type ‘B-Movie’ which Harry Sloan was known for when he was Co-Chairman of New World Pictures back in the 1980’s. Not to see MGM’s movies are not entertaining, and certainly watchable, but it seems that some of their more recent output has ruined its reputation.
It seems as though the bankruptcy option would be viable, although if worse comes to worse, I would assume that MGM can just ask the U.S. Government to bail them out. After all, we already own stock in the banking and auto industries, why not join the entertainment industry as well! Just a little humor of course.
John, serioiusly? In all that research you failed to realize that MGM HAS in fact ceased outputting self produced product and has EXCLUSIVELY distributed acquired content up until this year since Kerkorian’s last sell….right????? Also, the only film they are releasing this year IS a co-finance. Seriously man, seriously. And what about the Hobbit? That’s a joint deal with New Line. Man, good thing this wasn’t your dissertation. Put down the history book and look at the credits of some of those MGM releases. Just because their logo is on the front doesn’t mean they produce it. Maybe IMDB could be the website you frequent from now on. Hope that’s not your real name, cause I sure the hell won’t hire you if you come across my desk.