TiVo just issued this statement regarding the contempt sanctions ordered by the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, in the lawsuit against EchoStar and Dish: "We are pleased by the Court's ruling to impose contempt sanctions of approximately $200 million against EchoStar for its continued violation of a Court-ordered permanent injunction, and to award TiVo its attorney fees and costs incurred during the contempt proceedings. This brings total damages and sanctions in this case to approximately $400 million through July 1, 2009, plus attorney fees, and is exclusive of potential further damages and sanctions. Additionally, we are pleased that the Court 'will seriously entertain the award of enhanced sanctions' if 'EchoStar is unsuccessful on appeal and nevertheless continues to disregard this Court's orders.' We are confident that this ruling brings us closer to final resolution."
TiVo, a pioneer of digital-video recording services, had sought $974.5 million from Dish for contempt of court in their 5 1/2-year patent battle. Dish, the second-biggest U.S. satellite-television provider, and EchoStar told a federal judge in July that the company has acted in good faith and sanctions aren’t appropriate. But U.S. District Judge David Folsom in Texarkana, Texas, found a $2.25 royalty per DVR subscriber was appropriate. Dish and Echostar were ordered on June 2 by Folsom to stop using a digital-video recorder that infringed the TiVo patent. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had put Folsom’s order on hold until an appeal is decided.


Yeah, about The U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/24ward.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&ref=technology&oref=slogin
http://www.technologyreview.com/InfoTech-Software/wtr_16280,300,p1.html?PM=GO
The only way Tivo can make any money anynmore. Why don’t they stop trying to pirate money by claiming that any digital recording technology violates their patent rights and concentrate on updating their own antiquated, clunky DVR lines? Seriously, all of their business for years now has been pushing technology they never update or upgrade and filing lawsuits. I believe strongly in the right to protect one’s IP, but when that becomes your only business and your claims grow grander and grander, there is something wrong.
Not sure how it’s an infringement since Tivo is a POS and Dishs DVR seems to actually work as advertised.
Never had the satellite companies dvrs, but I have had both Tivos and the company dvrs from two different cable companies.
I don’t know what wonders the Dish DVR supposedly hold, but the Tivos had it all over any of the cable DVRs I have had, before and after HD. They are quicker, more intuivitive, and their playback is actually clearer. I’ve never had a cable dvr whose use couldn’t be described as anything but clunky.
I’ve also known at least two people upset that they couldn’t get a high definition tivo and had to settle for their satellite company HD DVR, refering to them in the same terms as the Anonymous reference to tivo. So, I’m not so sure they ‘work as advertised’. But as I’ve said, that wasn’t me.
I don’t know… I have two Dish DVR’s and they both have playback and sound sync problems.
I disagree with BOTH posters. Tivo’s DVR is the gold standard and folks stealing tech should be hammered. Tivo’s lines of business are far greater than mere lawsuits and I wouldn’t trade it in for a crummy cable/sat DVR. Bright boys and girls out there may want to actually USE the product before shooting off their mouth.
I just noticed that TiVo is filing suits against Verizon & AT&T too – http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090826-715006.html
Notice that TiVo is suing over infringing use of its “time-warping technology” – because “time-shifting technology” was established in the Sony Betamax lawsuit decades ago, and TiVo wouldn’t have a case.
Why else do you think they’re pursuing their cases in the only court in the country that’s notorious for its “pro-patentholder” decisions?
Hopefully AT&T & Verizon will sue TiVo into bankruptcy. It makes as much sense that one company should own the rights to make DVRs as it does that one company should own the rights to make TVs or MP3 players.
I’ve a Dish DVR and it works well. I also have a Sony HDD 250, the rare OTA DVR they made for one year and mysteriously dropped in the US market. Both work well. Why does no one make an OTA DVR ? Anyone ? Bueller ? HDCP cartel ?
How can recording data, ie a TV signal, and playing it back (of course crippled by the Studios) be infringing upon a patent ?.
My dish DVR is decent. Can’t compare to TIVO.
Sony, where’s the HDD 250 or 500 ?????