
Whatever happened to Time Warner synergy? That's what Entertainment Weekly is snarkily asking online because its "early look at the new Harry Potter movie just a got a whole lot earlier". My kudos to writer Jeff Giles who, perhaps for the first time in the recent history of the official magazine for receptionists, acually wrote something blisteringly honest about this oops in the movie biz instead of sugar-coating everything.
"In an irony sure to set blogger hearts beating giddily, the film graces the cover of EW’s new fall preview issue, which [just] hits stands. EW and Warner Bros. share a parent company, but they clearly do not share, you know, important friggin’ information.... A Warners publicist stressed that word about the rescheduling had only just come down today — which is most likely true, given that the Half-Blood teaser trailer is already in circulation. As of tomorrow, it will run with the new animated Star Wars movie, almost certainly still trumpeting a fall release date. The Potter movie is also on the cover of the fall preview issue of the British film magazine Empire. "
Underscoring that maxim ("Don't get mad, get even"), EW then proceeds to bitchslap the Warner Bros executives whose decision to push the film out of fall "presumably, is not something the executives just figured out this morning. Some outside the studio are already pointing out that moving Half-Blood will also stop next year’s profits from looking seriously underwhelming after the phenomenal success of The Dark Knight. 'They don’t need the money this year anymore,' says a rival studio exec. 'When a movie overperforms the way Dark Knight has, you really don’t need Harry Potter in the fall.' Asked about the seriousness of moving a Potter movie so late in the game, the exec adds, 'Turning a battleship that big isn’t easy. You’re not talking just about the movie, but all the merchandising, the toys and stuff. It’s huge. And it has a domino effect across the rest of the summer slate.'
"...Like every studio that ever pushed a movie back in a hurry, Warners’ press statement stressed how proud everyone is of the movie and tried to preempt any suggestion that something might be amiss, creatively or otherwise. One clear winner here — apart from EW readers now in possession of a 'Dewey Beats Truman' collectible — is Disney’s animated movie, Bolt, which will now have the family audience all to itself come Thanksgiving. Could it be that Harry Potter is just scared of dogs?"


This is a case of bad timing. If WB had announced it a week earlier EW could have pulled the cover, or a week later, and EW wouldn’t suffer a sales hit, but announcing it now really seems like sabotage.
However, you could say that if EW were movie experts, they might have figured out WB might do this and put out some calls.
But these things happen. I think the day after Enron went bankrupt, the company featured on the cover of a business magazine as a recommended buy.
It seems reasonable to push the date so WB doesn’t look, as stated, underwhelming, because of THE DARK KNIGHT. However, according to HR, Alan Horn blames the writers strike for the push.
I think this is a sign of a company being too big for its own good and “synergy” is replaced by lethargy. I mean how many outlets in video, print, online, etc. does Time Warner manage? I don’t even think they know anymore.
Though a screw up on this scale is pretty humongous, and shows a certain malfunction in communications.
Smart move. Now they may not look so bad in 2009.
Think Finke is being unnecessarily snarky about EW. It’s a perfectly fine entertainment magazine with good graphics and is read by more than receptionists. And it
occasionally has some bite, like the time it took on Tom Cruise and listed all his insane ramblings about psychiatry — well before the rest of the media piled on.
Not a Receptionist
P.S. EW’s not the only new enemy that Warner Bros. has made. If I was a rabid Harry Potter fan I’d be really pissed at WB for making me wait another seven or eight months for my fix. That’s really bad PR.
I love EW and hope that this encourages them to return to their snarky roots when commenting on this in the mag or on their site…. !!!
BTW not a receptionist here.. LOL
Never mind that, who in the fresh hell is responsible for that airbrushing job? Is it that Radcliffe is either not manly enough and needs a Superman jaw, or that Harry Potter can’t be seen with five o’clock shadow?
Or is it that EW’s graphics intern just discovered Photoshop and went to town?
Cough*Twilight*Cough
Boo! Hiss! Harry Potter fans will be loathe to support WB after this unnecessary move.
I can’t believe that this is simply about not looking bad next year compared to this year. A dollar in 2008 is worth more than a dollar in 2009; that’s basic finance. Like the rival exec says, too many other things were already in place for this move to make financial sense if the movie were really ready to go.
The only thing that I can think is that with next summer’s slate supposedly so weak because of the writers strike, maybe Warner saw an opportunity. And maybe the DVDs sell better if they get released closer to XMas. But it still seems like a big risk.
Way to go, sandbagging the ‘08 numbers because The Dark Knight outperformed their estimates.
I think maybe it’s just that Warners is scared of a dog named “Twilight”….
Some reports are saying that Harry Potter was pushed back because Daniel Raddcliffe will be appearing in his full frontal glory on Broadway during when the movie was supposed to be released originally which sounds stupid to me although it is one explanation for delaying its release.
WB had no right to do this. It is unfair and my friends and I refuse to support WB and all of its movies! I’m just going to watch Harry Potter online now and not see it in theaters. Go EW!
Despite some comments here, I doubt that this has anything to do with “Twilight”. The only people I know who are excited about seeing “Twilight” are 15-year-old girls.
Trust me its not just 15 year old girls, I work at a book store and the midnight release this month for Twilight was WAY more successful then then the last Harry Potter midnight release. This movie is going to be huge when it comes out.
Such intelligent assistants. Such profound insights. You go people.
Years ago, we repped an client who was in Disney’s BEAUTY AND THE BEAST on Broadway; Disney was premiering a movie one Monday when our client was off. Trying to get that client, on the Disney-stage, to the Disney-movie was one of the hardest things I’d ever negotiated. When I finally spoke to the movie-flack … he said, ‘Wow .. what a good idea!’ Synergy’s just a word … I’ve rarely seen it work successfully! btw: I didn’t know EW is just for receptionists … see, I learn something new every day!
The BBC quoted WB as saying that the losses incurred during the writer’s strike left the studio without a viable tentpole for summer 2009 – as if anyone would buy that. Kudos for a clever dig after a high profile loss to the little guy, though.
What really is terrible is that they’re using this move of HP to lessen the impact of trying to get rid of RocknRolla, Pride and Glory and Slumdog Millionaire from their fall lineup. Yes, like everyone really wants to watch New Line’s remakes and terrible horror stories instead of watching original screenplay films that have action, drama and comedy. I want to watch RocknRolla, and maybe I can’t cause I don’t live anywhere near the 3 cities in the spirited release this upcoming October. WB is doing a terrible job all around, not all film releases are tentpole films but that doesn’t make it terrible or unwatchable films either. By all that’s been written on RocknRolla to date, the reviews all say it’ll be a good film to watch.