EXCLUSIVE: Hollywood should be relieved that this buyer is still alive and kicking even if most of the financial world considers it on life support. I've learned from several sources that, any day now, MGM will announce that it will get a thumbs-up "going concern" opinion from the auditors (more below; updates my previous, MGM Fights To Survive. ). Also I've learned that private equity fund Qualia Capital LLC's Amir Malin and Ken Schapiro are out in the marketplace openly discussing the idea of a run at MGM when the time comes. Yes, a lot of folks have kicked the tires, but I agree with Business Week that they are serious players. After all, the industry vets built tiny Artisan Entertainment into something worth selling -- including a 6,000-title library -- to Lions Gate.
I first reported about the hurdle of this audit of MGM's activities, especially its TV and movie production slate, back on May 14th when the studio announced it was taking steps to restructure. Faced with $3.7 billion in debt due in July 2012, MGM will pay $250 million in interest alone by April 2010. The big question was if that burden was too much for the studio to bear now that the studio was finally coming clean about its problems. (I'd been hearing for months that MGM debtholders and equity stakeholders had been fighting to the point where both sides were "on a war footing".) Had the audit gone the other way, then thumbs-down could have triggered covenants forcing MGM to declare itself insolvent and/or repay its massive debt. In short, all hell could have broken loose.
Not to mention leaving production head Mary Parent in the lurch after she's been holding the studio together with the equivalent of chicken wire by partnering with studios left and right because they are willing to front the costs of each film. She also has been making some of the slate with the money from United Artist's deal with Merrill Lynch. MGM had been arguing that the best way to maintain the value of the studio's assets was to stay in the production business. And thus allow the $250M revolver debt due in April 2010 to get replenished from MGM's revenues like box office.
Also breathing a sigh of relief (if he doesn't get bounced) is studio topper Harry Sloan who took over the moribund MGM/UA in 2005 after Sony and Comcast and Providence Equity Partners and TPG Capital paid roughly $5 billion in debt and equity to acquire then publicly traded MGM from its majority owner Kirk Kerkorian. Sloan has to live with the fact that he waited until the worldwide credit crisis had begun to try to put MGM on firmer financial footing. Now Goldman Sachs is helping raise more capital. And other investment bankers Moelis & Co have been hired to advise the studio on a potential restructuring and to explore options for optimizing its capital structure -- i.e. talking to lenders about altering MGM's long-term debt obligations). And the Bank Of Montreal has to value whether the 4,000+ title library is worth near what it was when the 2005 deal for the studio was done despite the fall-off of the DVD market. (The studio claims the library throws off half a billion a year.) I've said it before and I'll say it again: Hollywood needs MGM to survive.


Mary is a total disaster. She is going to be the death of MGM. The woman has no idea what to make. Her taste in movies is atrocious. She’s incredibly overpaid. Sloan was a fool to pay her that much. Look at the crappy movies she’s making. Complete garbage.
To quote Groucho Marx, Mary must be going, She really must be going, She’s going to be of no concern.
Love you nikki but i think you need a vacation. no one needs MGM. It’s a loser, bad karma.
Haters, anyone? Their slate isn’t perfect, but there’s not a real dog project in the bunch and the execs working there at least know what the hell they’re doing, which is more than I can say for places like Paramount or Universal these days.
Anyone know how much the debt is selling, per cent on the dollar?
Yep, the world and the movie industry need a Pink Panther 3…
On one hand I can see the benefits of another potential buyer being in the marketplace for scripts and other projects. But on the other I’m still shocked how MGM is able to still be in business after all these years.
The entire studio has been a shambling ghost town of creativity never mind actual hits for what…,twenty years?
How can a studio that was once owned by a French bank after it defaulted on payments still being operating as business? It’s only a matter of time before MGM finally breaks down and is swallowed whole by another larger player.
The Rocky franchise is over and Sony ran Pink Panther into the ground. which just leaves Bond. And even then the last successes of that franchise are entirely down to Sony.
MGM has been treading water for years and years and now it’s finally run out of life lines. It will never be a big player again.
So while they can keep the lights on for a few more months the death clock, as it did for Warner Independent, Fox Atomic and New Line before it, is already counting down on MGM.
While MGM/UA has the potential to be a going concern, I worry that it’s being hampered by the weight of its own history.
Too many have tried to leap right back into being a major studio like it was in the old days, but it doesn’t have the resources to do it.
It needs to start smaller, more like a Lionsgate, make some money, get out of debt, and rebuild slowly and surely from there.
Plus, I don’t think the MGM name has the same cachet it once had, especially since most of the “classic MGM” library is now owned by Warner Bros.
“Going concern?” More like a “growing concern” for their investors! They’ve got nothing big coming up. A remake of Fame? Woo-fucking-hoo.
I don’t understand why so many of you are rooting against them. They have good people there and they are making movies. Why wouldn’t we want them to survive!
Dewey, their slate “isn’t perfect”? Are you kidding? It’s a joke. Hot Tub Time Machine??? Mary and Cale should be fired for that bullshit immediately. The first poster is right. MGM picks terrible scripts to produce.
I heard that HOT TUB TIME MACHINE was so bad that Cusak was re-writing on set. They have overspent for writers because Mary Parent doesn’t buy scripts, she buys concepts. And then once in, she’s pregnant with story, and overspends to try to get it right. Do you have any idea how much it cost to cut VALKERYE. For her winning is the only bottom line, not how much you spend in order to win (or in the case of VALKERYE, not be a total diseaster.
She is not a good leader. She does not delegate. She does not know good story. And she works with weak writers/producers/directors.
That’s the truth of the situation. Buyer beware.
Sloan is a fool with an ego and doesn’t need Mary’s help to be a fool. He was driving the company into the ground the moment he took over. HOLLYWOOD DOES NOT NEED MGM. It’s virtually MGM in name only cuz they don’t even own the MGM library pre 1990 (or thereabouts) which means none of the true MGM classics.
Totally agree Nikki! MGM has been a rock in Hollywood since the beginning of Hollywood history. All you naysayers out there, why don’t you look at the history because the future is determined by our roots.
I have one word for MGM: Pan Am. Let it go…
I’m shocked by the venom in some of these comments. Hollywood needs MGM to survive. It’s insane to wish for the demise of yet another buyer. I have two films at MGM, and I have to say Mary is a very smart, solid exec. Actually all of the executives over there have an impressive list of prior films, so unless your last name is Scorcese, you’re in no position to criticize the resume of any exec at that company.
The problem is not what they are buying or trying to get made, the problem, as Nikki has consistently pointed out, is the price that was paid for the studio back in 2006 and the debt they are carrying. Not only did they over-estimate the value of the library when they made the deal, but they also didn’t forsee the decline of DVD sales in the past two years. If that studio goes under it won’t be because of anything Mary Parent did, those deals were in place long before she took that gig. I genuinely hope MGM stays in the game.
You guys are nuts. They’re upcoming slate is awesome. Sure they’re overpaying talent and a bit heavy on the remakes, but they have ROBOCOP with Aronofsky, POLTERGEIST with Vadim Perelman, THOMAS CROWN with Verhoeven, THE HOBBIT, and THE MATARESE CIRCLE with Cronenberg. Pretty fun lineup if you ask me.
The loss of MGM would be more of a spiritual loss than of any actual detriment to the industry. MGM stands as, more or less, the grandfather of the industry. Its early leaders had more impact on the evolution of the business than did most of the other studio heads.
But now the studio has lost any sense of direction. And I say this as a former dept head over there. Mary parent is indeed holding the studio together with chicken wire. Beyond that, there are no goals besides “monetize” without any real idea of how to do it or how to react to the internet. Due to their financial straights, any new idea can’t even appear to take money from an existing revenue stream. There is no leadership and no successes to build momentum. They just keep going in circles.
Its sad and I don’t think there is any hope for the studio. Hopefully the name will live on as an imprint at its future owner but thats about the best it can hope for.
I just got here from the future to inform you that HOT TUB TIME MACHINE will save MGM. Hah. Who is managing “Cusak’s” career these days? Stick to horror movies, Johnny, that’s your middle-aged niche.
MGM does have some good stuff in their vaults, remake-wise. Parent just needs to exploit those properties.
Why don’t they merge with Lions Gate? Seems like a no-brainer to me
Hey Marcy,
John Cusack (not “Cusak”) is actually a producer on the film. He and Steve Pink did rewrites prior to production. The script (which, like practically everything made in town) was in flux, true, but despite a few pitfalls — some of which were caused by Cusack’s rewrites — it’s actually pretty clever and funny.
And Marcy, it’s hard to take you seriously when you can’t put together a coherent sentence or actually spell.
MGM is like one of those Russian aristicrats that was displaced by the Revolution: all pedigree but neither money nor land to back it up. Like RKO after Howard Hughes pulled the plug, Metro is coasting on its reputation, library, and favors owed, but is essentially adrift. I know people there, as do others on this blog, and their school spirit is high despite having a third-string varsity to root for. If MGM could become solely a distributor (like UA was when MGM made a deal with them in the mid 70s) it could become the go-to company for indie films, rights aggregators, and new media ventures. While other studios have to feed the brontosaurus with crushing overhead, Metro could trim down and live on cash flow. Ah, but a brand name comes with a heavy burden of ego.
They just really, really need to get their remake machine going – “Red Dawn,” “Robocop,” “Poltergeist,” etc. – then they’ll probably be fine as any one of those could be a substantial hit.
For the last ten years all MGM has been about is make just enough movies to appear to be a going concern, so they can tart up the old hooker with some new library titles and send her back out onto the street to hustle for a buyer. This corporate profit motive has nothing remotely to do with creative, so it doesn’t even matter how good the movies are or whether they make money, so long as there’s a Bond movie every couple of years.
Santayana,
Do you know anything about that company????? They were an Indy distributer for the last 4 years before Mary came on board. Geez, that must have worked out so well they had to stop it before it worked out any better and started making movies. And for anyone who’s criticizing the slate…RED DAWN people. There’s a reason Fox News is making better ratings these days.
Why would you want to lose a buyer? Hot Tub will be cool – and are you guys dissing cusack? Anyone rember Grosse Pointe? It was great
robocop is also cool
“If MGM could become solely a distributor (like UA was when MGM made a deal with them in the mid 70s) it could become the go-to company for indie films, rights aggregators, and new media ventures.”
They already tried that; didn’t really seem to bring in the Benjamins, especially when most of the movies they distributed were from The Weinstein Company.
> “I have one word for MGM: Pan Am. Let it go…”
Nice dual 2001 reference.
The problems at MGM/UA have nothing to do with Mary, and everything to do with Harry Sloan and the other people there leftover from the 2002 buy out deal. Mary, if left to her own devices and able to fund projects properly, could bring MGM back from the dead. Unfortunately, the creative group (who have all been hired within the last year or so) are hampered by having to explain film making and all that involves to a bunch of corporate bean-counter types who don’t know what a Grip is, much less what goes in to the day-to-day complexities of the start to finish of making a movie.
The debt is a huge albatross around the neck of MGM. But make no mistake, even if the debt were a non-issue, Sloan et al would still be the non-stop row of speed bumps on the road to getting anything done.
I know Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer believes every motion picture should be remade theatrically. One example of
their remarkable contuinuation of this filmmaking legacy is Fame, which opens nationally in September.
Like the 1980 cult favorite, which was directed by Alan Parker, who later went on to direct The Commitments in 1990.
I convince all Deadline Hollywood Daily members to watch the first of two trailer promoting the new Fame revival – this time, it’s from 1980.
http://www.youtube.com/videos
Followed by a YouTube trailer promoting the new 21st-century reimagining of Fame, opening this fall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch/generation_fame
Click above to watch both theatrical trailers.
Please Bring MGM Back From The Dead And Please Ask MGM To Do More Movies And TV Shows