<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hill Hugs On SNL; Obama Dances On Ellen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:35:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: America first</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-40450</link>
		<dc:creator>America first</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-40450</guid>
		<description>Obama? A great president? Remember those strings on his back are pulled by Daley and Soros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama? A great president? Remember those strings on his back are pulled by Daley and Soros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No longer Ben Tramer</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-40000</link>
		<dc:creator>No longer Ben Tramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-40000</guid>
		<description>Why does this warrant a talkback? I thought this was a show biz site?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this warrant a talkback? I thought this was a show biz site?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39977</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39977</guid>
		<description>Predictions:

1.) McCain has a heart attack, drops out of the race.

2.) Huckabee wins the GOP nomination, selects Condi Rice as VP.

3.) We &quot;find&quot; Osama, just before the election, securing the win for the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Predictions:</p>
<p>1.) McCain has a heart attack, drops out of the race.</p>
<p>2.) Huckabee wins the GOP nomination, selects Condi Rice as VP.</p>
<p>3.) We &#8220;find&#8221; Osama, just before the election, securing the win for the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egads</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39951</link>
		<dc:creator>egads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39951</guid>
		<description>Sweet lord that was lame.  Well at least the bright side is that I watched it within the promotional window and nobody got any residuals off it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet lord that was lame.  Well at least the bright side is that I watched it within the promotional window and nobody got any residuals off it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Time Sitcom Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39924</link>
		<dc:creator>One Time Sitcom Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39924</guid>
		<description>Hillary reading from cue cards on SNL... Obama dancing with Ellen...  It&#039;ll be a tough choice. Which desperate candidate do I choose??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary reading from cue cards on SNL&#8230; Obama dancing with Ellen&#8230;  It&#8217;ll be a tough choice. Which desperate candidate do I choose??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pathetic</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39917</link>
		<dc:creator>Pathetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39917</guid>
		<description>@Sandy 6:09

Hollywood rag US Weekly did a butt-kissing interview with  Obama.

Meanwhile, US Weekly did a feature belittling Clinton for her fashion sense.

The double standard in this campaign is sickening.  Ok to be sexist, but walk on eggshells with Obama so no one can be construed as racist.  

As for lampooning fashion and picking on Clinton&#039;s appearance, this is the same tired bag of tricks pulled on powerful women over and over.  It is anachronistic.  Clinton will not be knocked down by such nonsense and we hope other women take her cue.  

Don&#039;t buy US Weekly, Rolling Stone, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sandy 6:09</p>
<p>Hollywood rag US Weekly did a butt-kissing interview with  Obama.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, US Weekly did a feature belittling Clinton for her fashion sense.</p>
<p>The double standard in this campaign is sickening.  Ok to be sexist, but walk on eggshells with Obama so no one can be construed as racist.  </p>
<p>As for lampooning fashion and picking on Clinton&#8217;s appearance, this is the same tired bag of tricks pulled on powerful women over and over.  It is anachronistic.  Clinton will not be knocked down by such nonsense and we hope other women take her cue.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t buy US Weekly, Rolling Stone, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camron</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39913</link>
		<dc:creator>Camron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39913</guid>
		<description>&quot;guess the morons that devour that rag (to catch up on other “important issues” like the state of Britney’s vagina are what make up Obama’s fantatics.&quot;

C&#039;mon, Sandy, that&#039;s a pretty stupid statement. It&#039;s one thing to disagree with people who are for Obama, it&#039;s another thing to write them all off as &quot;fanatics&quot; and &quot;morons&quot; who read Us Weekly. It&#039;s also ignoring the facts; polling would indicate that the voters for Obama tend to be more educated. So even though I believe it&#039;s ignorant to generalize and label anyone just because they think differently than you do, &quot;elitist&quot; would be at least more accurate.

Besides, every candidate tries to connect with the average joe through a variety of methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;guess the morons that devour that rag (to catch up on other “important issues” like the state of Britney’s vagina are what make up Obama’s fantatics.&#8221;</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, Sandy, that&#8217;s a pretty stupid statement. It&#8217;s one thing to disagree with people who are for Obama, it&#8217;s another thing to write them all off as &#8220;fanatics&#8221; and &#8220;morons&#8221; who read Us Weekly. It&#8217;s also ignoring the facts; polling would indicate that the voters for Obama tend to be more educated. So even though I believe it&#8217;s ignorant to generalize and label anyone just because they think differently than you do, &#8220;elitist&#8221; would be at least more accurate.</p>
<p>Besides, every candidate tries to connect with the average joe through a variety of methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a spouse</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39906</link>
		<dc:creator>a spouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39906</guid>
		<description>Obama is half white. 

If we&#039;re going to say that the only performers who can portray him have to have the same composition as he has, then I guess SNL is going to have to drag Maya Rudolph away from her baby and back to the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is half white. </p>
<p>If we&#8217;re going to say that the only performers who can portray him have to have the same composition as he has, then I guess SNL is going to have to drag Maya Rudolph away from her baby and back to the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mheister</title>
		<link>http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39830</link>
		<dc:creator>mheister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadline.com/hillary-clinton-appearing-on-snl-tonight/#comment-39830</guid>
		<description>Clinton AND Obama supporters need to understand that sniping over whether women or blacks get the shorter end of the stick in no way addresses who&#039;s wielding the stick in the first place.

The articles I&#039;ve read on HuffPost and other places quoting feminists on Hillary&#039;s fate being related to her gender would have been articles quoting black leaders on how it&#039;s still harder to be a black man in this country than a white woman, had Clinton swept the last 11 primaries. When we&#039;re down to an African-American and a woman, and one has to come in second, there is bound to be righteous indignation from the aggrieved allies of the losing side. MSM relies on it to sell copy and clicks and get eyeballs, and their news reporting needs to be taken with a mine of salt.

IOW, don&#039;t let them sucker you into a &quot;Let&#039;s you two fight while I sit back and watch&quot;.

Obama will make a great president, and Clinton&#039;s influence in the senate will grow significantly, especially with a Democrat in the White House. And were Clinton to the be nominee, I&#039;d have said it the other way around. It&#039;s a win-win, at least as long as Democrats decide they&#039;re not going to try and snag defeat from the jaws of victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton AND Obama supporters need to understand that sniping over whether women or blacks get the shorter end of the stick in no way addresses who&#8217;s wielding the stick in the first place.</p>
<p>The articles I&#8217;ve read on HuffPost and other places quoting feminists on Hillary&#8217;s fate being related to her gender would have been articles quoting black leaders on how it&#8217;s still harder to be a black man in this country than a white woman, had Clinton swept the last 11 primaries. When we&#8217;re down to an African-American and a woman, and one has to come in second, there is bound to be righteous indignation from the aggrieved allies of the losing side. MSM relies on it to sell copy and clicks and get eyeballs, and their news reporting needs to be taken with a mine of salt.</p>
<p>IOW, don&#8217;t let them sucker you into a &#8220;Let&#8217;s you two fight while I sit back and watch&#8221;.</p>
<p>Obama will make a great president, and Clinton&#8217;s influence in the senate will grow significantly, especially with a Democrat in the White House. And were Clinton to the be nominee, I&#8217;d have said it the other way around. It&#8217;s a win-win, at least as long as Democrats decide they&#8217;re not going to try and snag defeat from the jaws of victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
