There's been another Wall Street margin call for a major Hollywood player because of the financial crisis and Wall Street crash.
It's now come to light that Lionsgate Entertainment Vice Chairman Michael Burns lost 49% of his stake in the mini-major on October 10th in a forced liquidation by Merrill Lynch as the stock plunged to more than a four-year low. Let me make that clearer: the shares were sold "pursuant to automatic forced liquidation by Merrill Lynch due to maintenance requirements for a pre-existing contractual obligation". In other words, the trades were not initiated at the direction of Burns. Merrill liquidated 672,000 of his shares for $4.04 million, according to regulatory filings. The sales left Burns with just 689,635 shares, according to the filings.
Michael Burns Loses 1/2 Lionsgate Stake


All this goes to show you that these big wigs who reportedly have a lot of noney don’t. The banks have the money and they loan it to them with the promise of making more money. This is what happened to the folks at Enron and all these other corrupt corporations. Screw ‘em all.
It gives you a good idea of the way wall street sees Hollywood. “we got to sell something we don’t really care about” “hey how about Lionsgate?”.
There is no truth to the rumor that the Scot Paper Company bought the Lionsgate stock shares to make toilet paper from them.
Scot is making tissue paper out of them.
Wall St. doesn’t treat Hollywood any different than any other sector. French guy – when you borrow against your stock and it declines to under a certain limit you get a margin call. Lots of stocks have declined massively based on forced liquidations. Ask Sumner Redstone or John Malone about this next time you bump into them at the Grill. Leverage…great when your stock goes up – deadly when your stock goes down.
To: A WGA Writer
Your notion that companies that use financial tools are somehow corrupt, is totally ignorant. Lines of credit, loans, etc. are standard business practices. Borrowing against an asset for leverage is certainly not corrupt. It can have its downside, as we see, but it’s upside is there as well. Simple risk/reward scenario. You never hear when things go right do you? Which would be the majority of the time.
Corruption at Enron was from another beast – that of arrogant morons who kept the stock propped up by nefarious means. They were crooks, pure and simple. Call it what you want – even use the word “greed” if that floats your boat – but to paint a really wide brush stroke in assuming all corporations are corrupt is nonsense.
Some day, if you are so inclined to use your own capital to your benefit, form one and go make a movie or whatever. You’ll see the anal exam that comes with running one. Lawyers, CPA’s, local/federal taxes, due-diligence for investors, blah, blah, blah. Sometimes you end up paying everyone else before you ever make a dime, but that’s another story for another time.
Maybe you are more comfortable being a “worker bee” and not giving it a shot yourself? Complaining about the evils is simply easier?